« Possibility of school-age children (gasp!) threatens housing bill | Main | Governor Corzine Signs Bill Allowing Private Professionals to Oversee Site Cleanups »

Governor Corzine Conditionally Vetoes Housing Bill

By: Henry T. Chou, Esq.

Apparently bowing to the pressure of mayors throughout the State, Governor Corzine has conditionally vetoed legislation that would have allowed builders to convert age-restricted (55+) residential developments to non-age restricted developments that would be open to persons of all ages.

The legislation, passed by the Senate and Assembly in March, would have allowed builders to essentially convert their developments as of right, as long as they substantially conform to the original development plans and agree to set aside a portion of the homes as affordable housing.

Mayors across the state lobbied against the legislation, arguing that it would result in an influx of families with children into their communities, which would in turn burden their school systems and increase property taxes.

In an effort to address the concerns of the mayors, Governor Corzine vetoed the legislation and represented that he would ultimately sign it if it were revised to include language that would give local land use boards the discretion to deny a conversion application if the converted development would result in substantial detriment to public interests and impair the intent of the town's zoning ordinance and master plan.

While the revisions proposed by Governor Corzine were aimed at placating the fear of municipalities, they will not in reality give local land use boards much discretion to deny conversion requests. Put otherwise, it would be difficult for a board to find that a converted development would be a substantial detriment to public interests and impair the intent of the zoning ordinance and master plan if it previously approved the same development plans. To do so would require boards to make the outlandish - and legally unsupported - determination that schoolchildren are a detriment to public interests.

It is anticipated that a revised bill will be considered by the Legislature in the next few months. In the meantime, it appears that municipal officials will continue to oppose any revised bill.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.hillwallack.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/160

Comments

This illustrates the absurd situation NJ finds itself in- we need affordable family housing for economic growth statewide, but the school funding formula discourages new housing construction-no one wants to pay to educate other people's children.
The State should indemnify the towns from the costs of new kids in the local schools--thus foster growth and help alleviate racial and social segregation. The Abbott system , where the State only pays for kids that stay in the cities, perpetuates the problem. We are spending billions to keep kids in the cities. We should level the playing field and let the free market work--let those who choose to live in Camden or Paterson live there, but provide housing opportunities for working families in the suburbs-where the jobs are.

Come on, give me a break! I'm just not buying it. Anyone could make this stuff up - where do you get your information?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)